Original concept art for Itchy & Scratchy “Up” parody in “Loan-a-Lisa”.
The Itchy & Scratchy bit at the beginning of “Loan-a-Lisa” was, to put it mildly, creatively bankrupt. It starts by spending forty-five seconds re-enacting “Up” with nary a joke in sight; that would be bad enough, but Zombie Simpsons then makes things even worse. Instead of ending with some kind of “Up” inspired violence (a balloon house falling on them, a giant blimp attack, a pack of remotely controlled dogs tearing them to pieces) it ends by repeating not one, not two, but three (3) scenes from previous Itchy & Scratchy episodes. In other words, they faithfully recreated “Up” until they could no longer directly copy the source material, then they copied something else. They couldn’t be bothered to come up with their own ideas, even derivative ones.
I know I said this last week, but it really does seem like they think developing new ideas is beneath them.
Mad Jon: You guys ready?
Charlie Sweatpants: Sure am, let’s get this over with so I can never think about this episode again.
Dave: Word.
Mad Jon: This was pretty bad.
How many inheritances does Grandpa have to give out?
Charlie Sweatpants: As many as need be between now and the time the show becomes unprofitable.
Dave: Two so far and it was only funny the first time.
Mad Jon: It pains me that we are now to the point they don’t even try to avoid re-doing premises.
Dave: No they sort of revel in it.
Faded glory and all that.
Charlie Sweatpants: Pretty much. That joke way back in Season 11 where Comic Book Guy comes on and says they did this already is looking better and better in hindsight. Now we don’t even get that.
Dave: They must think we’re stupid
Mad Jon: It’s probably more that they don’t care what we think or if we are stupid.
Dave: Well, that too.
Charlie Sweatpants: While we’re on the opening though, there are two excellent examples of painful joke stretching here. The small one is Bart mentioning how that won’t pay his vig, and then, because that line was so hard to come up with and didn’t last long enough, they cut to a shot of Jimbo in a conveniently placed window.
The second and much larger one was the whole deck of cards thing.
That Grampa’s hands shake so bad he can’t play cards is kinda funny, but then they ruin it by having Marge extend the gag for another ten seconds of tortuous screen time.
Mad Jon: I actually was physically embarrassed when that kept going.
That’s pretty rare for me with Zombie episodes, I usually just boil in anger.
Dave: You have a range of emotions as a human being.
Mad Jon: So I’ve been told.
Charlie Sweatpants: My "sympathy embarrassment" feelings for this show are pretty well numbed at this point.
Dave: Perhaps you will experience love next. But it sure as hell won’t be with Zombie Simpsons.
Charlie Sweatpants: He is married, you know.
Mad Jon: True, but in all fairness Teevee was my first love.
My wife was 15 years or so too late.
Charlie Sweatpants: Speaking of marriages, did you enjoy the condensed 45-second version of Up? I sure didn’t.
Dave: Ha.
No, that was miserable.
It just kept going and the payoff was nonexistent.
Pretty much like every other I&S in recent memory.
Charlie Sweatpants: No, it existed. It was just a rehash of about three other Itchy & Scratchys.
Mad Jon: That was really bad. Up made me feel things and stuff, the never ending I & S made me want to cry.
But not for the same reasons.
Charlie Sweatpants: There was another one like last year, albeit with a far more obscure film.
Mad Jon: Not that I cried at the opening of Up. No matter what any multiplex employee tells you.
Charlie Sweatpants: They are liars.
Dave: Jon, I share your secret shame.
Mad Jon: Not so secret anymore is it.
Dave: As long as we’re not flying to Holland and eating tulips.
Charlie Sweatpants: Now that was a movie parody. And I didn’t even need to suffer through "Sliver" to get the joke.
Mad Jon: What a delightful romp.
Charlie Sweatpants: In the spirit of good conversational transitions, Milhouse’s overly long rendition of "Hot Cross Buns" was another example of something that could’ve been funny if it had taken up about 10% of the screen time it actually did.
The first three words of that song was the joke, the next forty or so were just filler.
Mad Jon: Indeed, Milhouse’s girly behaviors can be wielded well, or poorly.
This was poorly.
Charlie Sweatpants: There was also Skinner’s whole 11-dollars-an-hour thing.
It was funny at first.
Then he ripped off his sleeves.
Mad Jon: Yeah, I was kind of checked out by then.
Charlie Sweatpants: Then Chalmers showed up.
Mad Jon: Oh yeah, then they argued about who saw it first.
That just kept going.
Charlie Sweatpants: It did provide them with a way to explain the bad epoxy to Nelson. Though why Skinner didn’t mention it sooner was left like a turd on a buffet table.
Continuing my transitional efforts, the Wiggum buffet scene also sucked, as did the whole "bag in danger" . . . motif? Action sequence? I’m not even sure what that was, but it lasted for a very long time and had a lot of string music of suspense.
Mad Jon: I was a bit confused as to what to call the returning items thing, was that just one extra mini-plot or are we talking B-plot sub a and sub b?
Because there was the bag thing, and the Homer stuff.
But I guess that is relatively unimportant.
Dave: Classification in this case is superfluous, yes.
Charlie Sweatpants: Well, it was unusual in that the b-plot started off as the a-plot, then it took a drastic left turn and became the b-plot.
Really, the guilty party here is us, because we’re using the word "plot" to describe things that have no resolution.
Dave: Also true.
Mad Jon: Bad student. Uh-uh-uh, bad principal.
Charlie Sweatpants: The "returning things" story was premised on the idea that Homer couldn’t afford these things, and at the end he got stuck with the bill (sort of) and nothing happened.
Mad Jon: And Chris Hhhaaaannnsooon was there too.
Charlie Sweatpants: Again, sort of.
Also, didn’t "To Catch a Predator" jokes get old about three years ago?
Mad Jon: Yep. Back when South Park did an episode about it.
Charlie Sweatpants: Sounds about right.
Pop quiz: which guest voice was more pointless, Yunus or Zuckerberg?
Dave: Both?
Charlie Sweatpants: Nice try, but it’s a trick question. There is nothing colder than absolute zero.
Mad Jon: Nice.
Dave: It’s cute that Zombie Simpsons wanted to tackle microfinance. But it’s way, way out of their league.
Charlie Sweatpants: Does that mean that there are still some things in their league?
Mad Jon: Play-dough?
Matchbox cars?
Finger painting?
…. that’s all I got.
Charlie Sweatpants: Jokes about when your lazy butler washes your sock garters and they’re still covered with schmutz?
Dave: Sure, that.
Mad Jon: Look at that waxy buildup.
Charlie Sweatpants: So this thing has totally wasted guest voices, stretches jokes way too long (the couch gag was interminable), and repeats shit from old episodes.
Is that about it?
Dave: Wasted implies value. I’d call them pointless.
Charlie Sweatpants: Well put.
Mad Jon: Yep, potentially two or three shitty episodes cut short, except for where it would have helped, rolled into one 22 minute puke fest, sprinkled with old events redone, cook for 20 minutes at 150 and everyone dies from e-coli.
Tell Aaronson and Zykowski:
The Mob Has Spoken